Hostie et poutine : mises en (s)cène du patrimoine alimentaire québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pour identifier certaines nourritures du patrimoine alimentaire du Quebec, les auteurs proposent de tenir compte de l'impact de la culture chretienne-catholique sur les habitudes alimentaires quebecoises. Plutot que de se contenter d'identifier les nourritures servies par exemple a Noel ou a Pâques, ils ont chois d'analyser les aliments figurant sur trois reinterpretations quebecoises de La Cene de Leonardo De Vinci. Cette double icone religieuse et culturelle a comme caracteristique d'etre un repas et de mettre en cene des aliments, des aliments qui peuvent varier de La Cene a ses copies et d'une copie a l'autre. Les auteurs examinent ici trois reinterpretations quebecoises de La Cene (un bas-relief de bois des iles de la Madeleine, une caricature des partisans du Canadien de Montreal et une affiche du Bal en blanc), avec l'hypothese suivante : si un artiste quebecois la reinterprete en lui ajoutant des aliments particuliers, c'est parce qu'ils sont charges d'une valeur symbolique particuliere, qu'ils font partie du patrimoine alimentaire quebecois. Les auteurs peuvent notamment inscrire a ce patrimoine le raisin, les ailes de poulet, la biere et l'hostie. Pour conclure, ils evoquent le risque de sacraliser du patrimoine alimentaire et suggerent de l'aborder plutot comme un matrimoine alimentaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".