MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004106037

Between Sovereignty and Statecraft: New France and the Contest for the Hudson Bay Watershed, 1663-1782

2020· dissertation· en· W3004106037 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott Berthelette

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCONTESTBaySovereigntyWatershedPolitical scienceGeographyOceanographyHistoryLawArchaeologyGeologyComputer sciencePolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation analyzes French-Indigenous relations in the Hudson Bay watershed from the early 1660s to the 1780s. The Hudson Bay watershed was a dynamic contact zone where Indigenous, French, and British politics, cultures, and economies clashed and intermingled. Whereas French colonial scholars have thoroughly examined French-Indigenous contact zones in other parts of North America, such as the pays d’en haut (Great Lakes region), the Illinois Country, and Louisiana, few have ventured to investigate French-Indigenous relations in the Hudson Bay watershed in any depth. Most of the scholarly attention on the region has hitherto focused on either local ethnohistories of Indigenous peoples or commercial and social histories of the British-run Hudson’s Bay Company. \n\nThis study examines French non-elites in the Hudson Bay watershed – coureurs de bois, company clerks, runaway soldiers, and veteran voyageurs – who acted as intermediaries and cultural brokers between Indigenous peoples and the French colonial government. This dissertation contributes to a broader scholarly discussion on Euro-Indigenous cultural brokers in contact zones by framing French non-elites as ambivalent agents of empire. While French non-elites, such as voyageurs and coureurs de bois, were instrumental to fulfilling French imperial projects and extending a French presence into the Hudson Bay watershed, they were not simply unwavering agents of imperial power. Their own agendas and interests often ensured that western expansion and French imperial designs advanced at an erratic, haphazard, and oscillating pace. This demonstrates that French imperialism in Western North America was not a monolithic top-down process but rather a multifaceted one, with competing voices, perspectives, and agendas. \n\nLastly, this study also challenges the chronological and spatial limitations of traditional Métis history. French non-elites underwent salient processes of métissage (cultural hybridity) to become backcountry specialists and cultural brokers between sovereign Indigenous homelands and the French colonial government in the Hudson Bay watershed. An examination of these French-Indigenous patterns of métissage that developed in the region over a one-hundred-and-fifty-year period provides crucial insight into previously unexamined cultural, economic, and political antecedents to the rise of the Métis. By analysing French-Indigenous métissage before, during, and after the British Conquest of New France (1760), this study rethinks the chronology of Métis peoplehood and nationhood Western North America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.147
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207