MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004226049 · doi:10.1029/2019jf005110

The Role of Englacial Hydrology in the Filling and Drainage of an Ice‐Dammed Lake, Kaskawulsh Glacier, Yukon, Canada

2020· article· en· W3004226049 on OpenAlexaffabout
David G. Bigelow, Gwenn E. Flowers, Christian Schoof, Laurent Mingo, Erik Young, Braden G. Connal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySubaerialGlacierHydrology (agriculture)TributaryShelf iceHydrographGeomorphologyDrainage basinFlood mythHydrometeorologyDrainageWater levelIce streamClimatologyCryosphereGeochemistryPrecipitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outburst floods from ice‐marginal lakes are poised to become more prevalent in a warming climate. As glaciers thin and tributaries detach, water can be impounded in these unstable lakes at valley confluences. To characterize the role of the little‐studied englacial hydrological system during an outburst flood cycle, we deployed a variety of geophysical and hydrometeorological instruments in and around an ice‐marginal lake dammed by the Kaskawulsh Glacier, Yukon, Canada, to capture its 2017 filling and drainage. The subaerial lake reached a maximum volume of 9.9 m on 17 August before draining over the course of 19 days. During lake filling, abrupt changes in ice shelf uplift rates are associated with the formation of faults and fractures. These hydromechanical interactions are closely linked to a redistribution of englacial water as evidenced by fluctuations in shallow borehole water pressures, and changes in radar internal reflection power. Water balance calculations reveal that the subaerial, subglacial, and englacial reservoirs respectively store 20 (17–23)%, 40 (25–50)%, and 40 (30–60)% of water in the catchment at peak lake level. The calculated englacial storage volume implies saturated porosities up to 4–10% locally or 2–4% catchment‐wide. The englacial system is therefore both volumetrically important and influenced by the hydromechanical interactions between the lake and glacier. Its spatial extent and storage capacity may play a role in lake drainage initiation, modulation of the flood hydrograph, and lake refilling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.874

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Earth SurfaceSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207