Complexity-Based Analysis of the Relation between Human Muscle Reaction and Walking Path
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Legs are the contact point of humans during walking. In fact, leg muscles react when we walk in different conditions (such as different speeds and paths). In this research, we analyze how walking path affects leg muscles’ reaction. In fact, we investigate how the complexity of muscle reaction is related to the complexity of path of movement. For this purpose, we employ fractal theory. In the experiment, subjects walk on different paths that have different fractal dimensions and then we calculate the fractal dimension of Electromyography (EMG) signals obtained from both legs. The result of our analysis showed that the complexity of EMG signal increases with the increment of complexity of path of movement. The conducted statistical analysis also supported the result of analysis. The method of analysis used in this research can be further applied to find the relation between complexity of path of movement and other physiological signals of humans such as respiration and Electroencephalography (EEG) signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it