MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004441898

Young, Educated, and Choosing Rural: An Exploration of the Factors Related to Young Adults Choosing to Move to Rural Communities

2019· article· en· W3004441898 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sarah Schmitt‐Wilson, Madison Reynolds Hanson, J. Mitchell Vaterlaus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyFutures contractRural areaEthnologyYoung adultHumanitiesGerontologyGeographySocioeconomicsGender studiesPolitical scienceMedicineBusinessArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With many rural communities facing uncertain futures due to aging and dwindling populations, it is of interest to explore what these communities have to offer young adults. The current case study was designed to explore the experiences of educated young adults moving to remote rural communities in Montana. While the young adults noted challenges such as a lack of amenities and geographic and social isolation, participants highlighted the quality of life they experience in their rural communities including the family-centered environment, low cost of living, the unconditional support provided by community members, intergenerational friendships, increased sociability, and the unique opportunities for personal and professional growth available for young adults in rural communities. Furthermore, participants shared suggestions for enticing young adults to move to rural communities, including ways they could increase occupational opportunities, market to young adults, and change the message about living in rural areas. Keywords: young adults, rural communities, opportunities ---------------------------------------- Jeunes, instruits et choix rural: une exploration des facteurs lies au choix des jeunes adultes de s'installer dans des collectivites rurales eloignees Avec de nombreuses communautes rurales confrontees a un avenir incertain en raison du vieillissement et de la diminution des populations, il est interessant d'explorer ce que ces communautes ont a offrir aux jeunes adultes. Cette etude de cas a ete concue pour explorer les experiences de jeunes adultes instruits qui demenagent dans des communautes rurales eloignees du Montana. Alors que les jeunes adultes ont note des defis tels que le manque d'equipements et l'isolement geographique et social, les participants ont souligne la qualite de vie qu'ils ont dans leurs communautes rurales, y compris l'environnement axe sur la famille, le faible cout de la vie, le soutien inconditionnel fourni par les membres de la communaute, les amities intergenerationnelles, la sociabilite accrue et les opportunites uniques de croissance personnelle et professionnelle offertes aux jeunes adultes dans les communautes rurales. En outre, les participants ont partage des suggestions pour inciter les jeunes adultes a s'installer dans les communautes rurales, y compris des moyens d'augmenter les opportunites professionnelles, de les vendre aux jeunes adultes et de changer le message sur la vie dans les zones rurales. Mots-cles: Jeunes adultes, communautes rurales, opportunites

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207