MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004486659

Clustering of anthracycline-containing lysosomes in drug-resistant MCF-7 cells in response to tesmilifene

2008· article· en· W3004486659 on OpenAlexaffabout
Baoqing Guo, Jason A. Sprowl, Stacey L. Hembruff, David J. Villeneuve, Amadeo M. Parissenti

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversitySudbury Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoxorubicinEpirubicinCytotoxicityAnthracyclineCancer researchCytoplasmBiologyDaunorubicinCancer cellClonogenic assayPharmacologyCancerChemotherapyMedicineApoptosisIn vitroCell biologyInternal medicineBiochemistryBreast cancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3223 A clinical trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group has shown that N,N-Diethyl-2-[4-(Phenylmethyl)Phenoxy] Ethanamine (tesmilifene) in combination with doxorubicin was superior to doxorubicin alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer in terms of overall survival (p=0.021. J. Clin. Oncol.22: 269-276). To address the mechanism for tesmilifene-induced clinical potentiation of drug cytotoxicity, doxorubicin-resistant (MCF-7DOX-2) and paclitaxel-resistant (MCF-7TAX-2) variants of MCF-7 cells were established in our laboratory. Clonogenic assays revealed that tesmilifene could effectively augment the cytotoxicity of a variety of chemotherapy agents specifically in these drug-resistant cell lines and this potentiation was independent of P-glycoprotein status. To better understand the mechanism of action of tesmilifene, confocal fluorescence microscopy was used to examine the distribution and localization of doxorubicin and epirubicin in drug-resistant cells in the absence or presence of tesmilifene. In wildtype MCF-7 cells, lysosomes were well distributed throughout the cytoplasm, while doxorubicin and epirubicin were consistently observed within the nucleus. In contrast, both drugs were located in the cytoplasm of some or all of MCF-7TAX-2 and MCF-7DOX-2 cells, respectively, where they co-localized with lysosomes (as visualized by LysoTracker staining). Addition of tesmilifene to the drug-resistant cells induced a very striking clustering of doxorubicin- or epirubicin-containing lysosomes to the perinuclear region. Clustering of lysosomes around the nucleus is a hallmark feature of necrosis, suggesting that tesmilifene may induce necrotic death in drug-resistant tumour cells. To identify genes which may be related to this phenomenon, a survey of gene expression using Operon Human Genome arrays (AROS V4) containing 35035 oligonucleotide probes was conducted in order to identify tesmilifene-induced changes in gene expression in the drug resistant cell lines in the presence of either doxorubicin or paclitaxel. Sixty-two genes were upregulated and 29 genes down-regulated by tesmilifene in MCF-7DOX-2 cells in the presence of doxorubicin. Tesmilifene upregulated 9 genes in MCF-7TAX-2 cells in the presence of paclitaxel. Two of the tesmilifene-dependent genes in MCF-7DOX-2 cells were found to be related to lysosome function and may play a role in the above-described phenomenon. These include the overexpression of cathepsin C (CTSC) and Lysozyme G-like Protein Precursor (LYG2). In MCF-7TAX-2 cells, Bcl-2 like 13 protein (BCL2L13) was induced by tesmilifene and is known to promote paclitaxel-induced cell death. Further studies are underway to identify the precise mechanism by which tesmilifene induces lysosomal clustering and the above changes in gene expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.349 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207