Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. On encountering public art / Martin Zebracki and Joni M. Palmer -- 2. Subverting surveillance: power and incivility in public transit art / Martha Radice and Brenden Harvey -- 3. 'Awaken the dragon': participatory art-making and the grassroots in authoritarian Singapore -- 4. The construction of post-communist ideologies and re-branding of Budapest: the case study of Statue Park Museum / Paul Clements -- 5. Sustainable influences of public art: a view on cultural capital and environmental impact / Cameron Cartiere and Ashley Guindon -- 6. Shaping subjects, connecting communities, imagining futures? Critically investigating Play Your Place / Harriet Hawkins and Ruth Catlow -- 7. The production of temporary public space: site-specific installation and 'vital materialities' / Gwen MacGregor -- 8. 'All your drains belong to us': young people and the non-representational geographies of public art in drain tunnels / Candice Boyd -- 9. Mobilising the 'Right to Remain' in Vancouver's Paueru-gai: an art based participatory research intervention / Aaron Franks, Jeff Masuda, Audrey Kobayashi and The Right to Remain community fair team -- 10. The art of (re)crossing the border: the Border Farm project in Maroi, South Africa / Pauline Guinard -- 11. The Birmingham Surrealist Laboratory: unlocking community and the avant-garde in a super diverse city / Saskia Warren and Stephen Forcer -- 12. A cybergeography of public art encounter: the case of Rubber Duck / Martin Zebracki -- 13. An artist-geographer's lens / Andrew Gorman-Murray.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.018 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.417 | 0.153 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".