High strength brushite bioceramics obtained by selective regulation of crystal growth with chiral biomolecules
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chirality seems to play a key role in mineralization. Indeed, in biominerals, the biomolecules that guide the formation and organization of inorganic crystals and help construct materials with exceptional mechanical properties, are homochiral. Here, we show that addition of homochiral l-(+)-tartaric acid improved the mechanical properties of brushite bioceramics by decreasing their crystal size, following the classic Hall-Petch strengthening effect; d-(-)-tartaric acid had the opposite effect. Adding l-(+)-Tar increased both the compressive strength (26 MPa) and the fracture toughness (0.3 MPa m1/2) of brushite bioceramics, by 33% and 62%, respectively, compared to brushite bioceramics without additives. In addition, l-(+)-tartaric acid enabled the fabrication of cements with high powder-to-liquid ratios, reaching a compressive strength and fracture toughness as high as 32.2 MPa and 0.6 MPa m1/2, respectively, approximately 62% and 268% higher than that of brushite bioceramics prepared without additives, respectively. Characterization of brushite crystals from the macro- to the atomic-level revealed that this regulation is attributable to a stereochemical matching between l-(+)-tartaric acid and the chiral steps of brushite crystals, which results in inhibition of brushite crystallization. These findings provide insight into understanding the role of chirality in mineralization, and how to control the crystallographic structure of bioceramics to achieve high-performance mechanical properties. Calcium-phosphate cements are promising bone repair materials. However, their suboptimal mechanical properties limit their clinical use. Natural biominerals have remarkable mechanical properties that are the result of controlled size, shape and organization of their inorganic crystals. This is achieved by biomineralization proteins that are homochiral, composed of l- amino acids. Despite the importance of chiral l-biomolecules in biominerals, using homochiral molecules to fabricate bone cements has not been studied yet. In this study, we showed that homochiral l-(+)-tartaric acid can regulate the crystal structure and improve the mechanical properties of a calcium-phosphate cement. Hence, these findings open the door for a new way of designing strong bone cement and highlight the importance of chirality in bioceramics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".