MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004622184 · doi:10.1089/eco.2019.0031

Wilderness Adventure Program May Help Combat Perceptions of Stigma Among Veterans

2020· article· en· W3004622184 on OpenAlex
Ashleigh Forsyth, Rosemary Lysaght, Alice Aiken, Heidi Cramm

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcopsychology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversityQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStigma (botany)WildernessAdventurePsychologyPopulationMental illnessExploratory researchPerceptionSocial psychologyPsychiatryMedicineMental healthEnvironmental healthSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Operational stress injuries (OSIs) are an increasing concern for military personnel, particularly those returning from conflict zones. Over the last decade, the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) has seen a sharp increase in the number of soldiers returning from Afghanistan who are reporting OSIs. Efforts have been made by the CAF and other agencies to help this population get the help they need through specialized programming. However, some are still not seeking treatment, in part due to the perceived stigma associated with mental illness. One novel approach to improving mental well-being is the Outward Bound Canada Veterans (OBCV) program. These adventure-based wilderness education courses are shown to have a positive impact on well-being among the veteran population. This study explores how the Outward Bound program facilitates a stigma-free environment which allows participants to more fully benefit from the therapeutic wilderness setting. This exploratory mixed-methods study used a pre-, post-, concurrent-nested mixed-methods design. This small-scale study evaluated the experience of participants (n = 20) in the 2016 program. The Endorsed and Anticipated Stigma Inventory was administered at three times followed by a single semi-structured interview (n = 6) covering themes related to the OBCV program and perceptions of self-stigma and public stigma. This study found that the process of the OBCV program facilitated an environment that was perceived by participants to be stigma-free. Evidence from interviews suggests aspects of self-stigma, such as gaining a sense of personal empowerment, may be positively influenced by participation in wilderness or adventure programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Other designlow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it