Conditional Training Based GM and GM-OPELM Data Fusion Schemes in Wireless Sensor Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a key infrastructure of Internet of Things (loT), wireless sensor networks (WSN) can be utilized in a wide range of applications. The prediction based data fusion methods provide effective tools to reduce the amount of data transmissions while maintaining prediction accuracy. Recently a grey prediction model (GM) combining optimally-pruned extreme learning machine (OPELM) data fusion method has been proposed and shown to have good performance. However, the existing GM- OPELM method performs model training and broadcasting before each prediction, resulting in high complexity and energy consumption. In this paper the conditional training based GM (CT-GM) and GM-OPELM (CT-GM-OPELM) are proposed. By introducing an error threshold, the algorithms only perform model training when the prediction error is beyond the threshold. Compared with existing GM and GM-OPELM methods, the CT- GM and CT-GM-OPELM methods not only can achieve the higher rate of acceptable prediction and better time efficiency but also has significant reduction in the energy consumption on model training and transmissions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it