MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004635435 · doi:10.1088/1555-6611/ab68e3

Evaluation of the proper level of specific absorption rate of human blood for 532 nm laser in blood low-level laser therapy

2020· article· en· W3004635435 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvester Jande Gemanam, Nursakinah Suardi, Soheila Mokmeli, Iskandar Shahrim Mustafa

Bibliographic record

VenueLaser Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLaser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sport Centre Pacific
FundersTertiary Education Trust FundTexas Emerging Technology Fund
KeywordsLaserMaterials scienceAbsorption (acoustics)OpticsHuman bloodMedicinePhysicsPhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Low-level laser has been used for a variety of clinical applications as a practical non-medicinal treatment, due to its ability to modulate blood rheology and improve biostimulation. This article research aim was to evaluate the proper level of specific absorption rate (SAR) of human blood during low-level laser treatment. Measurements were conducted on human blood in vitro , at different laser powers (wavelength 532 nm at powers of 50, 60, 70 and 80 mW) and exposure duration. Dielectric parameters were observed as a function of frequency from 40 Hz–30 MHz by utilizing an Agilent 4294A impedance analyzer at average room temperature of 25 °C. The SAR increased steadily with increasing frequency until it attained saturation peak, and thereafter exhibited a decrease trend. The SAR values range from 0.173–1.417 W kg −1 for blood irradiated using laser power of 50 mW and range from 0.178–0.754 W kg −1 for 60 mW. These values of SAR within 5–10 min of radiation present better stimulation results. Using laser powers of 70 and 80 mW for irradiations, the SAR values within the range from 0.003–0.791 W kg −1 and 0.130–0.491 W kg −1 , respectively, were computed. The SAR values here portend high risk associated to blood than its stimulation mechanism because the blood already attained a plateau and became saturated. This causes imbalance within the blood molecules resulting in a decrease in SAR as the frequency increases. This is due to a phase lag that develops between the electric field and induced dipole alignment creating a significant drop in the SAR of blood. The rate of inhibition increases rather than stimulation since the thermal radiation becomes exceedingly high resulting in crenation and hemolyzation of the blood. Therefore, we recommend using a laser at an output of power 50 mW for 5–10 min to reach the maximum capacity of SAR for more absorption and optimal stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.212
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaser PhysicsSame topicLaser Applications in Dentistry and MedicineFrench-language works237,207