MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Private/Public Spheres

2016· other· en· W3004674173 on OpenAlexaff
Susan Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSimone de Beauvoir and Sartre
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHegemonyPrivate sphereRealmPublic sphereNormativeIdeologyGender studiesHuman sexualitySociologyPolitical scienceSeparate spheresHeterosexualityPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The division between private/public spheres is key to Western knowledge and the liberal tradition. Critical analysis has exposed the division as ideological and as linked to power relations. The public sphere is constructed as the legitimate realm of powerful groups and reflects the hegemony of heterosexuality. The private sphere has been gendered female and homosexuality has been tolerated only if kept private. Both domestic labor and domestic violence have been hidden in the household. Despite challenges to the private/public divide by feminists and those with non‐normative sexualities, the divide continues to hold resonance and to be the site of critical inquiry, especially given the influence of neoliberalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality StudiesSame topicSimone de Beauvoir and SartreFrench-language works237,207