MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004710756 · doi:10.12691/ajnr-8-2-10

Developing Competencies of Maternity Nurses on Relieving Postpartum Perineal Pain Using Cold Application

2020· article· en· W3004710756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amany Ali Abd El-Salam, Eman Ashour

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican journal of nursing research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy-related medical research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChecklistMedicineNursingIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionInterviewNursing Interventions ClassificationPostpartum periodFamily medicinePsychologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nursing competency is one of the factors to be considered in assessing the performance of a nurse. It includes knowledge, skills and attitudes (KSA) which could lead to the achievement of the goals of the nurse to the patient. A variety of nursing interventions aimed at relieving perineal pain are largely based on localized cooling. Unfortunately, these interventions may not follow the accurate nursing practice for providing immediate and adequate postpartum perineal pain relief. The accurate assessment and appropriate management of postpartum perineal pain requires high levels of nursing skills and competency. Aim of the study: To investigate developing competencies of maternity nurses on relieving postpartum perineal pain using cold application. Method: A quasi-experimental research design was used. Sample: A convenience sample of 70 staff nurses who had worked in the study settings and purposive sample of 200 postpartum women from the same place. Settings: The study was conducted at the postpartum unites in Teaching Hospital and University Hospital, at Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia Governorate, Egypt. Instruments: Four instruments were used in this study for data collection, a structured interviewing questionnaire, competency standards checklist (CSC), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and postpartum comfort questionnaire (PCQ). Results: There was an increase in the percentage of nurses who were classified at the good level in their knowledge and practice regarding perineal cold application to postpartum women in the post-intervention compared to the pre-intervention and overall competency practice increased significantly (p < .001) in the post-intervention compared to the pre-intervention. Conclusion: The nurses who are subjected to competency intervention about relieving the postpartum perineal pain using cold application had a higher knowledge score and a competent practice in the post-intervention than pre-intervention. Recommendations: In-service training programs should be provided for developing the nurses’ competency regarding postpartum perineal cold application in order to develop their best practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican journal of nursing researchSame topicPregnancy-related medical researchFrench-language works237,207