Neonatal Outcomes Following Culture-negative Late-onset Sepsis Among Preterm Infants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Culture-negative late-onset sepsis (LOS) is commonly diagnosed in neonatal intensive care units, while the outcomes of neonatal culture-negative LOS are not reported for large cohorts. This study aimed to examine the incidence and neonatal outcomes for culture-negative LOS in a contemporary multicenter cohort of preterm infants. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from a cluster-randomized controlled study. Infants <34 weeks of gestation and admitted to 25 neonatal intensive care units between May 1, 2015, and April 30, 2018, were included. Culture-negative LOS was diagnosed if infants had abnormal manifestations and laboratory tests but negative blood cultures. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality or morbidities including periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) ≥ stage 3 or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). RESULTS: Of 22,346 eligible infants, 1505 (6.7%) infants had culture-negative and 761 (3.4%) infants had culture-positive LOS. Compared with infants without LOS, infants with culture-negative LOS had higher rates of composite outcome (24.1% vs. 9.6%), death (3.8% vs. 1.8%), PVL (4.8% vs. 2.2%), severe ROP (3.3% vs. 1.1%) and BPD (18.1% vs. 7.0%). After adjustment, culture-negative LOS was independently associated with increased risk of composite outcome {adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-2.1]}, PVL [aOR: 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.8)] and BPD [aOR: 1.8 (95% CI: 1.5-2.2)] relative to the absence of LOS. CONCLUSION: Culture-negative LOS was frequently diagnosed in preterm infants and was associated with increased risks of adverse outcomes. There is an emerging need for more precise diagnosis and treatment strategies for culture-negative LOS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it