MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rate of conversion from unresectable to resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in real-world patients (RWP) treated with FOLFIXIRI ± bevacizumab: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

2020· article· en· W3004728915 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tayyaba Bhatti, Mike Moser, Adnan Zaidi, Duc Le, Haji Chalchal, John M. Shaw, Selliah Kanthan, Mussawar Iqbal, Yigang Luo, Kamal Haider, Tehmina Asif, Dueck Dorie-Anna, Dilip Gill, Nathan Ginther, Shahid Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaskatchewan Cancer AgencySaskatchewan HealthUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBevacizumabInternal medicineIrinotecanColorectal cancerPopulationSurgeryOxaliplatinRegimenOncologyCancerChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

21 Background: Recent evidence from randomized trials suggests that FOLFOXIRI (5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) ± bevacizumab is associated with higher response rates with a potential for conversion of unresectable to resectable disease in mCRC. Yet limited evidence is available about efficacy and safety of this regimen in RWP with mCRC. The current study aims to evaluate conversion rate and safety of FOLFOXIRI ± bevacizumab in RWP with unresectable mCRC. Methods: Each year about 175 patients are diagnosed with mCRC in Saskatchewan. Patients who were diagnosed with unresectable mCRC between Jan 2015 to Dec 2018 and received FOLFOXIRI ±bevacizumab were assessed. Kaplan Meier survival methods and log rank test were performed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors correlate with conversion. Results: 28 eligible patients with median age of 51 yrs (IQR:39-60) and M:F of 11:16 were identified. 42% patients had a comorbid illness, and 43% had WHO performance status of 0. 39% had rectal cancer, 46% had extrahepatic disease and 46% had bilobar liver metastases. 58% patients had a positive response to therapy, 60% had grade 3/4 toxicity & 32% required hospital admission. No treatment-related mortality was noted. 54% patients underwent metastasectomy (liver 73%, peritoneum and or ovaries 20%, lung 6%). 68% had primary tumor resection, 29% received rectal radiation, 21% had ablation and 18% had second surgery for recurrence. At 4 years 50% patients are alive. Median progression free survival of patients who underwent surgery is 18 (95%CI:11.3-24.7) vs. 11 months (4-18.1) without surgery (P = 0.28). Median overall survival of patients with surgery is 33 (17.5-48.5) vs. 16 months (8.3-23.7) without surgery (P = 0.03). Positive response to treatment is correlated with conversion (odd ratio 21.7, p = 0.002). Conclusions: In the real world setting younger patients with good performance status received FOLFIRINOX ± bevacizumab. Despite high rates of toxicity, more than half of patients were able to undergo surgery. A positive response to treatment significantly correlates with metastasectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207