A single-arm, phase II study of intrahepatic chemotherapy in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
162 Background: In Canada, the standard of care for patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM) is systemic chemotherapy and/or best supportive care. Intrahepatic chemotherapy using floxuridine (FUDR), in addition to systemic chemotherapy, is available in the United States but its adoption outside major centers has been limited. Methods: A single-center, prospective study of intrahepatic chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with uCRLM was initiated at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in 2014. Patients underwent implantation of a hepatic infusion pump with resection of their primary tumor (if in place). Patients were treated with FUDR in addition to systemic chemotherapy (FOLFIRI or FOLFOX). Study objectives include the rate of conversion to complete resection, time to progression (TTP), disease-free survival (DFS), time to progression in liver, overall survival (OS), andresponse rate (RR). Results: From 2014 to present, 46 patients have been enrolled. Median age at the time of HAIP placement was 51 years (30-72 years). Males accounted for 61% (28/46). All patients received at least one cycle of systemic chemotherapy prior to surgery. 44 patients received a minimum of one cycle of FUDR, with the median number of cycles of FUDR received being 7.5 (0-28 cycles). Only one patient was unable to receive any FUDR after surgery. Response rate was 80% (n = 37/46). Three patients are too early for assessment. Eight (17.4%) patients have undergone liver resection. Median number of cycles of FUDR prior to resection was 7 (4-13 cycles). TTP, DFS, time to progression in liver, OS, and safety will be presented. Conclusions: The addition of intrahepatic chemotherapy to best systemic therapy may provide an increase in the rate of conversion to complete hepatic resection in patients with uCRLM. Clinical trial information: ON1233.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".