Potential of phytase supplemented Moringa oleifera leaf meal based diet on mineral digestibility of Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This current study was planned to evaluate effect of exogenous phytase supplementedMoringaoleifera leaf meal (MOLM) diet on mineral digestibility of Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings. To conduct the experiment, six experimental diets based on MOLM with 0, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 FTU kg-1 phytase level wereformulated. Chromic oxide (1%) was added in the feed as indigestible marker. Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three replicates was adopted to accomplish the experiment. Stocking density in each V-shaped triplicate tank was 15 fingerlings; fed at the rate of 5% of live wet weight. Results predicted that the fish group fed MOLM based diet supplemented with 600 FTU kg-1 phytase showed highest Apparent Digestibility Coefficient (ADC) % of minerals and minimum quantity was discharged through feces. Hence, to release chelated minerals in MOLM, phytase at the level of 600 FTU kg-1proved very effective.By viewing above results, it became clear that phytase supplementation to MOLM based diet is helpful in formulation of cost effective and environment friendly feed forO. niloticus fingerlings. © 2020, Green Wave Publishing of Canada. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".