Serum osmolality, cerebrospinal fluid specific gravity and overt hepatic encephalopathy severity in patients with liver failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a leading contributor to morbidity in liver disease. While hyperammonaemia plays a key role, the mechanisms of cerebral toxicity are unclear. We hypothesized that serum hyperosmolality contributes to HE during acute (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) through mechanisms that affect the water and solute composition of the cerebral environment. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of serum osmolality, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) solute density (specific gravity, determined from computed tomography attenuation) and clinical HE severity (Glasgow Coma Score [GCS]) at the time of intensive care admission in a prospectively identified cohort of liver failure patients with overt HE. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients (39 ALF and 34 ACLF) were included, of whom 28 (38%) were comatose. Serum osmolality (303.9 ± 15.4 mOsm/kg) was elevated despite normal serum sodium (136.6 ± 6.3 mEq/L). Increased osmolality was independently associated with more severe encephalopathy (ordinal adjusted OR 0.26 [95% CI 0.22, 0.31] for higher GCS per standard deviation increase in osmolality) and lower CSF-specific gravity (linear adjusted β = -0.039 [95% CI -0.069, -0.009] Hounsfield unit per 1 mOsm/kg). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of related research, these data suggest that hyperosmolality increases brain exposure to metabolic toxins by blood-brain barrier alteration and may be a unique therapeutic target.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".