RASSF effectors couple diverse RAS subfamily GTPases to the Hippo pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Activated RAS GTPases signal by directly binding effector proteins. Effectors have a folded RAS association (RA) domain that binds exclusively to GTP-loaded RAS, but the specificity of most RA domains for >150 RAS superfamily GTPases is unknown. Ten RAS-association domain family (RASSF) proteins comprise the largest group of effectors, proposed to couple RAS to the pro-apoptotic Hippo pathway. We show that RASSF1-6 complex with Hippo kinase, while RASSF7-10 are a separate family related to p53-regulatory ASPP effectors. Only RASSF5 directly binds activated HRAS and KRAS. Structural modelling reveals that expansion of RASSFs in vertebrates included amino acid substitutions that alter their GTPase binding specificity. We demonstrate that the tumour suppressor RASSF1A complexes with the GTPases GEM, REM1, REM2 and the enigmatic RASL12. Interplay between RASSFs and RAS GTPases can drastically restrict YAP1 nuclear localization. Thus, these simple scaffolds can link activation of diverse RAS proteins to Hippo or p53 regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".