MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3005333129 · doi:10.5194/tc-2020-3

The Copernicus Polar Ice and Snow Topography Altimeter (CRISTAL): Expected Mission Contributions

2020· article· en· W3005333129 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Kern, R. Cullen, B. Berruti, Jérôme Bouffard, Tânia Casal, Mark R. Drinkwater, Antonio Gabriele, Arnaud Lecuyot, Michael Ludwig, Rolv Midthassel, Ignacio Navas Traver, Tommaso Parrinello, Gerhard Ressler, Erik Andersson, Cristina Martin Puig, Ole Andersen, Annett Bartsch, S. L. Farrell, Sara Fleury, Simon Gascoin, Amandine Guillot, Angelika Humbert, Eero Rinne, Andrew Shepherd, M. R. van den Broeke, John Yackel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopernicusEarth observationPayload (computing)CryosphereSnowSea iceRemote sensingEnvironmental scienceMeteorologySatelliteGeologyEngineeringGeographyComputer scienceAstrobiologyAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. One of the candidate missions in the evolution of the Copernicus Space Component (CSC) is the Copernicus polaR Ice and Snow Topography ALtimeter (CRISTAL). The aim of this mission is to obtain high-resolution sea-ice thickness and land ice elevation measurements and includes the capability to determine the properties of snow cover on ice to serve Copernicus’ operational products and services of direct relevance to the Polar Regions. The evolution of the CSC is foreseen in the mid-2020s to meet priority user needs not addressed by the existing infrastructure, and to reinforce the Copernicus services by expanding the monitoring capability in the thematic domains of anthropogenic emissions (CO2), polar and agriculture/forestry/emergency. This evolution will be synergetic with the enhanced continuity of services foreseen with the next generation of the existing Copernicus Sentinels. New high-priority candidate satellite missions have been identified by the European Commission (EC) for implementation in the coming years to address gaps in current capability and emerging user needs. This paper describes the CRISTAL mission objectives, main mission requirements driving its design, the payload complement currently under development and its expected contributions to the monitoring of important components of Earth’s cryosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→