La protection du passager aérien victime de dommages non corporels dans l'espace UEMOA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chaque jour, de millions de personnes se deplacent a travers le monde par avion. Cependant, durant ces deplacements, les voyageurs sont confrontes a de recurrents « dommages non corporels ». Ces dommages qualifie de « non corporels » sont de deux (02) ordres. Il s’agit, d’une part, des dommages lies aux bagages (perte ou deterioration ou retard de livraison de bagages) et, d’autre part, ceux lies aux vols (refus d'embarquement, annulation et retard de vols). Face aux regles de mise en œuvre de la responsabilite civile du transporteur aerien ainsi que l’indemnisation derisoire qu’offrait la Convention de Varsovie, il a ete adopte la Convention de Montreal. Ce nouveau texte s’inscrit dans une logique de realiser un equilibre satisfaisant entre les besoins des passagers et les interets du transporteur. Aussi, la particularite de l’espace UEMOA reside dans le fait qu’une partie des Etats a ratifie la Convention de Montreal pendant que d’autres Etats restent sous l’empire de la Convention de Varsovie. Cette etude permettra donc d’analyser le regime juridique de protection des passagers aeriens en provenance ou en partance d’un Etat membre de l’UEMOA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".