Corn response to banded phosphorus fertilizers with or without manure application in Eastern Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Legacy phosphorus (P), corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids, weather conditions, and regulation on land‐applied manure affect site‐specific mineral P requirements. Mineral P fertilizers are still banded at corn seeding as insurance policy even where manure P is applied in compliance with regulation in Eastern Canada. Our objective was to measure the effects of site‐specific factors on the response of corn hybrids of the “new” era (1991+) to mineral and manure P fertilization under regulatory constraints. A dataset of 370 corn P fertilizer trials conducted between 1998 and 2004 in Quebec, Canada, comprised trials using mineral P alone (229 trials) or in combination with manure (141 trials). Linear mixed statistical models tested the effect of P fertilization on seedling biomass, grain yield, grain bulk density, and grain moisture content as affected by weather and soil indices. Early plant growth proved to be a poor indicator of final crop performance. Where no manure was applied, grain yield and quality were affected primarily by soil pH, texture, and genesis. There were responses to P additions only where the saturation index (P/Al) M3 was less than 5%. Mineral P fertilizers showed no significant effect on crop performance where manure was applied, but manured soil generally showed (P/Al) M3 percentages exceeding 5%. Banding mineral P at corn seeding where manure was applied at rates complying with the regulation and the (P/Al) M3 percentage exceeded 5% appeared to be a waste of resource under the soil and climate conditions in Eastern Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".