Investigation of Activity, Participation and Quality of Life in Elderly Living in Ankara and Antalya Provinces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı; evde yaşayan yaşlıların aktivite, katılım ve yaşam kalitesi düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir.Yöntemler: Çalışmamız Ankara ve Antalya illerinde, kendi evlerinde yaşayan 65 yaş ve üstündeki 120 yaşlı bireyde (60 kadın, ortalama yaş: 71,4±5,3yıl; 60 erkek, ortalama yaş: 70,8±4,7yıl; yaş aralığı: 65-83 yıl) gerçekleştirildi.Toplumsal katılım düzeyleri, Dünya Sağlık Örgütü tarafından geliştirilen Yetiyitimi Değerlendirme Çizelgesi-II (WHO-DAS-II) ile değerlendirildi.Katılımcıların aktivite performanslarını değerlendirmek için Kanada Aktivite Performans Ölçümü (KAPÖ) kullanıldı.Yaşlıların yaşam kalitesi düzeyleri Kısa Form-36 (KF-36) Sağlık Taraması Anketiyle değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Katılımcıların günlük yaşamlarında performans problemi yaşadıkları önemli aktiviteler; yemek yapma (n=52), alış-veriş yapma (n=48), duş alma (n=38) ve namaz kılma (n=37) aktiviteleriydi.WHO-DAS-II, KAPÖ ve KF-36 değerlendirme ölçeklerinin sonuçlarında cinsiyetler arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmedi (p>0,05).KAPÖ'nün alt puanları ile WHO-DAS-II'nin toplam puanı arasında istatistiksel olarak orta derece negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki bulundu (p<0,05).KF-36 ile WHO-DAS-II arasındaki ilişkiyi incelediğimiz zaman ise KF-36'nın bütün alt parametreleriyle WHO-DAS-II'nin toplumsal katılım alanı ve toplam puanı arasında istatistiksel olarak zayıf-güçlü derece negatif yönde anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu tespit edildi (p<0,05).Sonuç: Çalışmamızda, evde yaşayan yaşlı bireylerin aktivite performanslarının artmasıyla toplumsal katılımlarının arttığı, Objective: This aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between activity, participation and quality of life in the elderly living at home.Methods: This study was applied to 120 elderly people (60 females, mean age: 71.4±5.3 years; 60 males, mean age: 70.8±4.7 years, ranged between 65-83 years) aged 65 years and older and living at their home in Ankara and Antalya.The community participation levels were assessed with World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule, Second Version (WHO-DAS-II).Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to evaluate the activity performance of participants.The elderly's quality of life levels were assessed with Health Survey Questionnaire Short Form-36 (SF-36).Results: The important daily living activities of participants in which they had problems were: Cooking (n=52), shopping (n=48), having a shower (n=38) and praying (salaat) (n=37).According to the results of WHO-DAS-II, COPM and SF-36, there were no statistical differences between gender groups (p>0.05).There was a moderate significant negative correlation between the sub-scores of COPM and total score of WHO-DAS-II (p<0.05).Also, There was a weak-strong significant negative correlation between all subparameters of SF-36 and WHO-DAS-II total score and community participation sub-parameter (p<0.05).Conclusion: Our study showed that the community participation of elderly people living in the home increased with the increase in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".