Isolated Cyclic Loading During Adolescence Improves Tibial Bone Microstructure and Strength at Adulthood
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Bone is a unique living tissue, which responds to the mechanical stimuli regularly imposed on it. Adolescence facilitates a favorable condition for the skeleton that enables the exercise to positively influence bone architecture and overall strength. However, it is still dubious for how long the skeletal benefits gained in adolescence is preserved at adulthood. The current study aims to use a rat model to investigate the effects of in vivo low‐ (LI), medium‐ (MI), and high‐ (HI) intensity cyclic loadings applied during puberty on longitudinal bone development, morphometry, and biomechanics during adolescence as well as at adulthood. Forty‐two young (4‐week‐old) male rats were randomized into control, sham, LI, MI, and HI groups. After a 5 day/week for 8 weeks cyclic loading regime applied on the right tibia, loaded rats underwent a subsequent 41‐week, normal cage activity period. Right tibias were removed at 52 weeks of age, and a comprehensive assessment was performed using μCT, mechanical testing, and finite element analysis. HI and MI groups exhibited reduced body weight and food intake at the end of the loading period compared with shams, but these effects disappeared afterward. HI cyclic loading increased BMD, bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular number, and decreased trabecular spacing after loading. All loading‐induced benefits, except BMD, persisted until the end of the normal cage activity period. Moreover, HI loading induced enhanced bone area, periosteal perimeter, and moment of inertia, which remained up to the 52nd week. After the normal cage activity at adulthood, the HI group showed increased ultimate force and stress, stiffness, postyield displacement and energy, and toughness compared with the sham group. Overall, our findings suggest that even though both trabecular and cortical bone drifted through age‐related changes during aging, HI cyclic loading performed during adolescence can render lifelong benefits in bone microstructure and biomechanics. © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".