MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005691499 · doi:10.1101/2020.02.11.944405

The genome sequence of the Jean-Talon strain, an archeological tetraploid beer yeast from Québec

2020· preprint· en· W3005691499 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anna Fijarczyk, Mathieu Hénault, Souhir Marsit, Guillaume Charron, Tobias Fischborn, Luc Nicole-Labrie, Christian R. Landry

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFermentation and Sensory Analysis
Canadian institutionsLallemand (Canada)Université LavalPROTEO
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGenome Canada
KeywordsDomesticationStrain (injury)GenomeYeastBrewingWhole genome sequencingBiologyGeneticsArchaeologyEvolutionary biologyGenealogyGeographyGeneHistoryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The genome sequences of archeological yeast isolates can reveal insights about the history of human baking, brewing and winemaking activities and migration around the globe. A yeast strain called Jean-Talon was recently isolated from the vaults of the Intendant’s Palace of Nouvelle France on a historical site in Québec City. This site has been occupied by various breweries, starting from the end of the 17th century and until the middle of the 20th century. We sequenced the genome of the Jean-Talon strain with short and long reads and reanalyzed the genomes of hundreds of yeast strains to identify its species of origin and determine how it relates to other domesticated and wild strains. The Jean-Talon strain is a tetraploid strain with numerous aneuploidies, is partially sterile and most closely related to beer strains from the beer and bakery genetic groups and industrial strains from the United Kingdom and Belgium. We conclude from this that the Jean-Talon strain most likely derives from recent brewing activities that took place in the same location and not from wild yeast that could have been domesticated by the original brewers of the Nouvelle France on the site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207