MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005698181 · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0026-6

Imaging mass cytometry and multiplatform genomics define the phenogenomic landscape of breast cancer

2020· article· en· W3005698181 on OpenAlexaff
H. Raza Ali, Hartland W. Jackson, Vito Riccardo Tomaso Zanotelli, Esther Danenberg, Jana Fischer, Helen Bardwell, Elena Provenzano, M. Al Sa’d, Shahar Alon, Samuel Aparício, Giorgia Battistoni, Shankar Balasubramanian, Robert Becker, E. S. Boyden, Dario Bressan, Alejandra Bruna, B. Marcel, Carlos Caldas, Maurizio Callari, Ian G. Cannell, Helen Casbolt, N. Chornay, Yi Cui, A. Dariush, K. Dinh, A. Emenari, Y. Eyal-Lubling, Jean Fan, Edward A. Fisher, E. A. González-Solares, C. Gónzalez-Fernández, Daniel Goodwin, Wendy Greenwood, Francesco Grimaldi, Gregory J. Hannon, Opusunju Boma Harris, Shelley Harris, Cristina Jauset, Johanna A. Joyce, Emmanouil D. Karagiannis, Tatjana Kovačević, Laura Kuett, Russell Kunes, A. Yoldaş, Dongbing Lai, Emma Laks, Hsuan Lee, M. Lee, Giulia Lerda, Y. Li, Andrew McPherson, Neal L. Millar, Claire M. Mulvey, Fiona Nugent, Ciara H. O’Flanagan, Marta Pàez‐Ribes, I. Pearsall, Fatime Qosaj, Andrew Roth, Oscar M. Rueda, Tamara Ruiz, Kirsty Sawicka, Leonardo A. Sepúlveda, Sohrab P. Shah, Abigail Shea, Anubhav Sinha, Adrian L. Smith, Simon Tavaré, Sandra Tietscher, Ignacio Vázquez-Garćıa, Siegfried Vogl, N. A. Walton, Asmamaw T. Wassie, Spencer S. Watson, Sonja Wild, Elena Williams, Jonas Windhager, C. Xia, Ping Zheng, Xiaowei Zhuang, Suet‐Feung Chin

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Cancer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaProvincial Health Services Authority
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UK
KeywordsPhenotypeBreast cancerBiologyMass cytometryContext (archaeology)GenomicsComputational biologyCancerCellTranscriptomeStromal cellCancer researchGenomeGeneticsGene expressionGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations332
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature CancerSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207