Abstract PD2-03: CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+ breast cancer cell lines are hypersensitive to TTK inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i), in combination with hormonal therapies, have become standard of care for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Despite demonstrating significant improvements in progression-free survival, acquired resistance to these inhibitors invariably develops. Recent analyses of clinical samples have identified emergent genomic alterations conferring acquired resistance to CDK4/6i, and begin to define the biology of this new clinical entity. Discovery of vulnerabilities of CDK4/6i-resistant tumours is imperative to improve the survival of this group of patients. We modeled CDK4/6i resistance in ER+ breast cancer cell lines using two complementary approaches: (1) spontaneous development of resistance upon continuous exposure to the palbociclib for 6-9 months, and (2) genetic engineering of RB1 loss of function. In both cases, palbociclib resistance was confirmed by colony formation and cell proliferation assays. To identify potential therapeutic strategies for CDK4/6i-resistant cells, we tested the in vitro activity of novel cell cycle inhibitors using sulforhodamine B (SRB) cytotoxicity assays. CFI-402257, a selective TTK inhibitor now in Phase I testing, induced significantly increased cytotoxicity in different CDK4/6i-resistant models compared to parental cell lines, including but not exclusively those with RB1 loss. CFI-402257 treatment caused defects in cell cycle progression and increased DNA damage and genomic instability in CDK4/6i-resistant cells, while these effects were mild in parental, CDK4/6i-sensitive cell lines. In some cases, these phenotypes were accompanied by an increase in apoptotic signaling. Analysis of the molecular determinants of these effects are being evaluated (additional results will be presented). In xenografts derived from MCF7 cells, CFI-402257 treatment completely abrogated the growth of RB1-KO tumours and had a much less pronounced effect on wild-type tumours. In summary, our results nominate the TTK inhibitor CFI-402257 as a promising therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients who progress after CDK4/6 inhibition. A clinical trial testing this strategy is being launched. Citation Format: Isabel Soria Bretones, Kelsie L Thu, Jennifer Silvester, Reza Kiarash, Graham C Fletcher, Jennifer Cruickshank, Mark R Bray, Tak W Mak, David W Cescon. CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+ breast cancer cell lines are hypersensitive to TTK inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-03.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".