MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3005790887 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.245147

BCS-BEC crossover in a <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math> excitonic magnet

2020· article· lv· W3005790887 on OpenAlexaff
Nitin Kaushal, Rahul Soni, Alberto Nocera, Gonzalo Álvarez, Elbio Dagotto

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBasic Energy SciencesU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsExcitonLambdaQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The condensation of spin-orbit-induced excitons in ${t}_{2g}^{4}$ electronic systems is attracting considerable attention. At large Hubbard $U$, antiferromagnetism was proposed to emerge from the Bose-Einstein Condensation (BEC) of triplons (${J}_{\text{eff}}=1$). Here, we show that even at intermediate $U$ regimes, the spin-orbit exciton condensation is possible leading also to staggered magnetic order. The canonical electron-hole excitations (excitons) transform into local triplon excitations at large $U$, and this BEC strong coupling regime is smoothly connected to the intermediate $U$ excitonic insulator region. We solved the degenerate three-orbital Hubbard model with spin-orbit coupling ($\ensuremath{\lambda}$) in one dimension using the density matrix renormalization group, while in two dimensions we use the Hartree-Fock approximation (HFA). Employing these techniques, we provide the full $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ versus $U$ phase diagrams for both one- and two-dimensional lattices. Our main result is that at intermediate Hubbard $U$, increasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ at fixed $U$ the system transitions from an incommensurate spin-density-wave metal to a Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) excitonic insulator, with coherence length ${r}_{\mathrm{coh}}$ of $\mathcal{O}(a)$ and $\mathcal{O}(10a)$ in $1d$ and $2d$, respectively, with $a$ being the lattice spacing. Further increasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$, the system eventually crosses over to the BEC limit (with ${r}_{\mathrm{coh}}\ensuremath{\ll}a$).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2880.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207