Die Wiederherstellung der Gesellschaft Jesu: Vorbereitung, Durchführung und Auswirkungen: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Wallis, edited by Paul Oberholzer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Auswirkungen: Unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Verhältnisse im Wallis.Münster: Aschendorff, 2019.Pp. 678 + xiv.Hb, €76.00.The bicentennial of the restoration of the Society inspired numerous confer ences, including those with relatively focused agendas.One such gathering was hosted by the University of Freiburg, focusing on the return of the Jesuits to Switzerland after 1814, with special attention to the canton of Valais (Wal lis).The resulting volume is a massive tome made of contributions of varying length and depth, and which sheds considerable light on facets of the restora tion period that typically have not received much space in more general his tories of the period.Although the focus is on Switzerland, which-as Adrian Loretan's essay shows-was a religious battleground for much of the nine teenth century, the contributions inevitably address the politics and practical problems associated with the wider restoration of the Society.Assisting the reader in developing this broader view is the fourpart model provided by Mariano Delgado of the types of countries to which the restored Society returned, in which the important distinction is made between coun tries committed to religious tolerance, and those with true freedom of religion.And in addition to the familiar story of Jesuits struggling to function in a new world of nationalism, we are also reminded that this world had distinctly "Rou seauian" features that rejected authority of all kinds, and which was far less intimidated by the power of organized religion.Running through many of these essays is the implication that the restored Society and its supporters underestimated and misunderstood this trend.At the same time, products more typical of the presuppression Society, such as a Latin poem with distinctly baroque touches, Verus socius Jesu identified by Marc Lindeijer, surfaced suggesting just how backward looking the restored Society could be at times.Lindeijer also reminds us of the central importance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".