MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3005856409 · doi:10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.tp481

Abstract TP481: Deep and Superficial Brain Arteries Flow Pattern Suggest Differential Risks to Systemic Hemodynamics

2020· article· en· W3005856409 on OpenAlexaff
José Gutierrez, Pablo J. Blanco, J. David Spence

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsThrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerforating arteriesCerebral arteriesCircle of WillisAnatomyBasilar arteryPulse pressureArteryHemodynamicsCerebral circulationCardiologyBlood pressureInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Penetrating arteries supplying the basal ganglia and the brain stem are often affected by chronic hypertension whereas distal branching arteries supplying the brain convexity and corona radiata may be injured by hypoperfusion. We hypothesized that under equal systemic flow dynamics, distal branching brain arteries will have a lower pressure peak than penetrating arteries. Methods: We used an Anatomically Detailed Arterial Network (ADAN) model to predict pressure waveforms for brain and systemic arteries. The anatomical details were obtained from published literature and match for an average man, height of 170 cms and body surface area of 1.65 m2. Arterial length and radius were obtained from published literature for each organ. Standard governing equations for the flow of an incompressible fluid in compliant pipes are considered in each arterial segment. Proper coupling conditions at junctions are also postulated, as well as terminal Windkessel models. Results: Compared to systemic arteries, brain arteries have an early peak in flow and pressure, followed by a gradual decline in flow and pressure over time (figure 1). The posterior parietal artery has the lowest MAP and pulse pressure of the four brain arteries tested, even if the pulsatility and resistance indices remained relatively the same. Consequently, the pressure pulse peak for the posterior parietal artery hovers around 80 mmhg compared with approximately 110 mmHg for the lenticulostriate arteries and the middle cerebral and basilar arteries. Lenticulostriate arteries had similar hemodynamic profiles to the large artery branches of the circle of Willis. Conclusion: Penetrating brain arteries are susceptible to high pressure remodeling because of their immediate branching from a large artery, while distal cortical arteries are more susceptible to hypoperfusion. These regional susceptibilities to systemic hemodynamic may influence brain health and contribute to neurodegeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→