Neurophysiological Features of Peripheral Nervous System Involvement and Immunological Profile of Patients with Primary Sjögren Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, type of neuropathy, and the relationship between the presence of autoantibodies and neuropathy development in patients with primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS). Methods Sixty-one patients with pSS underwent a complete neurological and electrophysiological examination as well as immunological tests including rheumatoid factor (RF) and autoantibodies such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-Ro/SSa, and anti-La/SSB antibodies. Results The axonal loss or demyelination were found in 39 patients (63.9%). Twenty-nine (47.5%) subjects fulfilled both clinical and electrophysiological criteria of peripheral neuropathy of predominantly axonal type. Seropositivity to both anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies was more frequently found in patients with normal nerve conduction study. Seropositivity to anti-Ro alone was present in the majority of patients with axonal neuropathy ( P < 0.05). The presence of RF was associated with several electrodiagnostic signs of demyelination ( P < 0.01). The ANA titer showed no independent association with neuropathy. Conclusion Peripheral neuropathy is a frequent complication in patients with pSS. Seropositivity limited to anti-Ro is associated with increased risk of axonal neuropathy in comparison to seropositivity to both anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies. Seropositivity to RF may contribute to demyelination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".