MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006057360 · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1008276

Evolution of microsporidia: An extremely successful group of eukaryotic intracellular parasites

2020· article· en· W3006057360 on OpenAlexafffund
Lina Wadi

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS Pathogens · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMicrosporidiaIntracellularBiologyIntracellular parasiteGroup (periodic table)MicrobiologyZoologyEvolutionary biologyCell biologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OverviewMicrosporidia are obligate intracellular parasites that can infect a wide range of hosts.They cause death and disease in both humans and agriculturally important animals.They have also become a powerful model for understanding the evolution of intracellular parasites.Recent work has explored how microsporidia genomes have evolved, the evolutionary origins of microsporidia, and how microsporidia adapt to interact with their hosts. What do microsporidia have in common?Microsporidia can only exist outside of their host as environmentally resistant, chitin-containing spores.These spores contain a unique infectious apparatus known as the polar tube.During infection, the polar tube is rapidly discharged and can pierce a host cell, depositing the parasite's sporoplasm within the host cell [1].The sporoplasm then proliferates, eventually producing spores that then exit the host to cause subsequent infections.Microsporidia are thought to reproduce mostly asexually, although most are likely diploid based on genomic heterozygosity and conservation of meiotic genes [2-5].Because of the intimate relationship between microsporidia and their hosts, they are heavily dependent on host resources and have undergone extensive genomic reduction [6,7].Analysis of sequenced microsporidia genomes (Fig 1A) has revealed a wide loss of protein families that are present in other eukaryotes, leaving only approximately 800 conserved microsporidia proteins [6].The proteins that have been retained function in essential core cellular processes such as DNA replication, transcription, and translation [6,8,9].Proteins that have been lost include many metabolic enzymes, regulatory pathways, and proteins involved in vesicular transport such as TOR (Target of Rapamycin) and clathrin [8][9][10].In addition, the proteins that are retained are shorter than their fungal orthologs, with Encephalitozoon cuniculi proteins being on average only 85% as long as their yeast counterparts [3,11].One such instance of proteins that have decreased in size are the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, which have lost many regulatory regions, including a domain in leucyl-tRNA synthetase (LeuRS) that edits mischarged tRNAs.The microsporidia Vavraia culicis was shown to have mistranslation error rates of 5.9% at positions that coded for leucine-although valine, which has a corresponding tRNA synthetases with an intact editing domain, has a mistranslation rate of 7.5%, suggesting that there are other factors responsible for the high levels of mistranslated proteins [12].Microsporidia also have reduced noncoding RNAs, including the 18s RNA, which is only approximately 2/3 as large as in other eukaryotes and results in the smallest eukaryotic ribosomes [13].Although this reduction has led to several binding sites being eliminated, structural and mass spectrometry analysis of ribosomes from Vairimorpha necatrix demonstrated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations162
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS PathogensSame topicParasitic Infections and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207