MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006098685 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnz393

A Basis of Casimirs in 3D Magnetohydrodynamics

2020· article· en· W3006098685 on OpenAlexafffund
Boris Khesin, Daniel Peralta‐Salas, Cheng Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical SciencesMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstituto de Ciencias Matemáticas
KeywordsMagnetic helicitySemidirect productMagnetohydrodynamicsCasimir effectMathematicsHelicityGroup (periodic table)Action (physics)Pure mathematicsSpace (punctuation)Basis (linear algebra)Mathematical physicsDual spaceProduct (mathematics)Lie algebraAlgebra over a fieldPhysicsMagnetic fieldClassical mechanicsGeometryQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We prove that any regular Casimir in 3D magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) is a function of the magnetic helicity and cross-helicity. In other words, these two helicities are the only independent regular integral invariants of the coadjoint action of the MHD group $\textrm{SDiff}(M)\ltimes \mathfrak X^*(M)$, which is the semidirect product of the group of volume-preserving diffeomorphisms and the dual space of its Lie algebra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207