MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006268624 · doi:10.1177/0894486520904461

The Adulthood of Family Business Research Through Inbound and Outbound Theorizing

2020· article· en· W3006268624 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Jaskiewicz, Donald O. Neubaum, Alfredo De Massis, Daniel T. Holt

Bibliographic record

VenueFamily Business Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFamily Business Performance and Succession
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamFamily businessContext (archaeology)LegitimacyOrder (exchange)Field (mathematics)AsideSociologyMarketingPublic relationsBusinessPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Adulthood of Family Business Research Through Inbound and Outbound TheorizingSince the early 1980s, the rapid growth of family business research has led to the establishment of the academic field of family business.Concurrently, the nature of the research conducted in the field has evolved through a number of developmental stages.Early studies, when the field was young and in its primary stage, tended to highlight the differences in the actions, behaviors, and performance of family and non-family businesses.This effort was justified and necessary, in part, in order to establish family businesses as unique organizational entities worthy of scholarly investigations (e.g., Sharma, 2004).As the field matured, gained legitimacy, and moved towards its adolescence stage, research on family business shifted to applying mainstream theories born in other disciplines (which we refer to as inbound theorizing) to show how and why family businesses are not only distinct from non-family businesses, but how family businesses are distinct from each other (e.g., Chua, Chrisman, Steier, & Rau, 2012).In this stage of development, researchers cast aside the monolithic view of family businesses and developed theories and insights that focused on their heterogeneity (e.g., Brune, Thomsen & Watrin, 2019).This Review Issue provides evidence that the family business field has evolved further and reached the next stage -its adulthood.The four articles in this Review Issue not only highlight distinct processes among family businesses, as well as between family and non-family businesses, but actually go one step further: They review and inquire how the context of family business creates opportunities to give back to mainstream theories and thereby contribute significantly to revise, adapt, and develop existing theories and redefine their boundary conditions from other fields of study (which we refer to as outbound theorizing).Each of the four articles in this Review Issue does so in a unique way, highlighting the immense opportunities of (1) doing research in the context of family business and (2) contributing to significant theory development.In this editorial,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamily Business ReviewSame topicFamily Business Performance and SuccessionFrench-language works237,207