MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3006343786 · doi:10.26685/urncst.174

Influence of Developmental Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Exposure on Longitudinal Cognitive Flexibility and Neuron Morphology in the Prefrontal Cortex: A Research Protocol

2020· article· en· W3006343786 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Nguyen, Lucas J. Omazic

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrefrontal cortexCognitive flexibilityNeuroscienceFlexibility (engineering)NeuronCognitionPsychologyBrain morphometryMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cannabis is one of the most commonly used substances during pregnancy. The components of cannabis are able to cross the placental barrier. Furthermore, perinatal cannabis exposure in affected offspring has been associated longitudinally with cognitive deficit in the form of attention. Therefore, we hypothesize that developmental Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) exposure affects cognitive flexibility and leads to permanent neuron morphology changes in affected offspring. We propose to test these hypotheses in the offspring of 25 C57BL/6 THC-exposed pregnant mice by conducting a visual discrimination with reversal task (VDR) at post-gestational day 40 (P40), P80, P120 and a Golgi-Cox staining protocol at P140 in pyramidal cortical neurons of layer II/III and VI of the prefrontal cortex. The combination of this behavioural paradigm and the dendrite analysis for length, diameter and volume can provide insight on neurobiological consequences of perinatal cannabis and may lead to the development of therapeutic interventions in affected children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.455
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal→Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→