MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006411236 · doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b03072

Direct Observation of Methylmercury and Auranofin Binding to Selenocysteine in Thioredoxin Reductase

2020· article· en· W3006411236 on OpenAlexafffund
Ingrid J. Pickering, Qing Cheng, Emérita Mendoza Rengifo, Susan Nehzati, Natalia V. Dolgova, Thomas Kröll, Dimosthenis Sokaras, Graham N. George, Elias S.J. Arnér

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRedox biology and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseCanada Research ChairsCancerfondenCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsChemistryAuranofinThioredoxin reductaseSelenocysteineMethylmercuryThioredoxinBiochemistryStereochemistryCysteineEnzymeSeleniumOrganic chemistryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenoenzymes, containing a selenocysteine (Sec) residue, fulfill important roles in biology. The mammalian thioredoxin reductase selenoenzymes are key regulators of antioxidant defense and redox signaling and are inhibited by methylmercury species and by the gold-containing drug auranofin. It has been proposed that such inhibition is mediated by metal binding to Sec in the enzyme. However, direct structural observations of these classes of inhibitors binding to selenoenzymes have been few to date. Here we therefore have used extended X-ray absorption fine structure as a direct structural probe to investigate binding to the selenium site in recombinant rat thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1). The results demonstrate for the first time the direct and complete binding of the metal atom of the inhibitors to the selenium atom in TrxR1 for both methylmercury and auranofin, indicating that TrxR1 inhibition indeed can be attributed to such direct metal-selenium binding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicRedox biology and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207