MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006447266 · doi:10.1093/crocol/otaa008

Oral Bran in Patients With Quiescent Ulcerative Colitis: Another Piece in the Diet Puzzle

2020· editorial· en· W3006447266 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wael El‐Matary

Bibliographic record

VenueCrohn s & Colitis 360 · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisBranMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineFood scienceDermatologyBiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

“What food should I eat?…. what food should I avoid?”. Very common questions that we all hear from our patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The role of diet in the pathogenesis of IBD through its effect on the intestinal microbiome is extremely important and has been the focus of basic and clinical research for years.1 The efficacy of several diets in the induction and maintaining remission of IBD has been under investigation. Nonetheless, only the exclusive enteral nutrition using elemental or polymeric formulas has been proven effective in induction of remission with a questionable value as a supplementary feed for maintenance of remission for Crohn’s disease.2–4 However, adherence to this diet can be challenging mainly because of exclusivity.1 A step toward improving adherence has been the introduction of a more tolerable diet, the Crohn’s disease exclusion diet, in a recent article by Levine et al.5 The Crohn’s disease exclusion diet includes a list of disallowed foods including gluten, yeast, dairy products, red meat (animal fat), processed meats, and products containing emulsifiers; it is a low-sugar but not low-carbohydrate diet with 18–20 g of fiber per day.5 On the other hand, the role of diet in managing ulcerative colitis (UC) has been under-investigated with less promising results as compared to Crohn’s disease. In an attempt to examine the role of diet in patients with UC, Nyman et al.6 randomized a group of adult patients with quiescent UC to either receive oral bran or low-fiber wheat products for 24 weeks. Oral bran seemed to increase fecal butyrate, lower serum low-density lipoprotein, and maintained no gastrointestinal symptoms. The number of relapses, however, was the same in both groups at the end of the follow-up period, which may be related to the sub-optimal concentration of fecal butyrate. Although the study is limited by the small sample size, high number of dropouts, and lack of studying associated changes in the intestinal microbiome, it adds an important piece of knowledge to the growing body of literature that investigates the role of diet in IBD. Funding: None. Conflict of Interest: W.E.M. served as an advisory board member for Janssen and AbbVie Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.435
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrohn s & Colitis 360Same topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207