MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006504666 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.054202

Energy velocity of multiply scattered waves in strongly scattering media

2020· article· en· W3006504666 on OpenAlexafffund
Benoit Tallon, Thomas Brunet, Jacques Leng, J. H. Page

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRandom lasers and scattering media
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaLabexAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsScatteringPhysicsEnergy (signal processing)Computational physicsOpticsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The important influence of the relative refractive index of scattering inclusions on energy transport of classical waves through disordered media is clearly demonstrated through ultrasonic experiments on monodisperse emulsions. Our ultrasonic techniques measure both the transmitted average wave field and the multiply scattered diffusive intensity, enabling a full characterization of wave transport through the media and the measurement of both the group and energy velocities over a wide range of frequencies. The emulsions were fabricated using microfluidic techniques that permit accurate control of droplet size and concentration, for droplet inclusions with very different acoustic properties relative to the yield stress fluids in which the droplets were immersed. Thus we have been able to investigate emulsions containing either ``slow'' fluorinated oil droplets (sound speed ${v}_{1}$ less than ${v}_{0}$ of the surrounding fluid) or ``fast'' liquid metallic droplets $({v}_{1}>{v}_{0})$. We find that the energy velocity that describes the transport of energy by the dominant diffusive waves is mainly governed by the sound speed within the scatterers, and can be either much slower or faster than any of the other wave velocities. The possibility that the energy velocity could be faster than any other wave velocity when ${n}_{\text{rel}}={v}_{0}/{v}_{1}<1$ was not anticipated in previous work. These observations are successfully explained by theories that are valid for scalar waves in media containing a low concentration of scatterers, and are directly applicable to our dilute ``all-fluid'' emulsions. The role of droplet resonances on the behavior of the energy velocity is also demonstrated, and the mechanism leading to the large differences in the energy velocity in the two emulsion systems is elucidated through calculations of the energy density inside the droplets relative to the incident energy density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicRandom lasers and scattering mediaFrench-language works237,207