Intravascular volumes evaluated by a carbon monoxide rebreathing method in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of fluid overload and anemia remains a challenge in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Hypervolemia can be evaluated using a carbon monoxide (CO) rebreathing method by which blood volume (BV), plasma volume (PV), and red blood cell volumes (RBCV) can be determined. We hypothesized that recurrent hypervolemia would cause hemoglobin (Hb) levels to be in the anemic range without a concurrent reduction in RBCV in patients undergoing hemodialysis. METHODS: BV, PV, and RBCV were determined by a CO rebreathing test in 19 patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing chronic hemodialysis. The tests were performed 20 minutes before initiating dialysis, and the measured intravascular volumes were compared with predicted normal intravascular volumes according to Nadler's equation. Before initiating dialysis, Hb and blood pressure were measured, and edema severity was graded. FINDINGS: Measured BV was higher in 17 out of the 19 patients with a median of 71.1 (62.4-76.9) mL/kg and higher than the predicted BV of 58.3 (53.5-59.9) mL/kg (P < 0.001). The measured PV was found to be higher in all patients. RBCV was measured as 25.2 (23.4-28.2) mL/kg with a predicted volume of 25.9 (22.4-26.7) mL/kg (P = 0.56). Eighteen patients were anemic as determined by Hb concentrations (defined as Hb < 13 g/dL for men and <12 g/dL for women), and nine were anemic according to RBCV. DISCUSSION: The CO rebreathing test is a new approach to measuring intravascular volumes in hemodialysis patients. Compared with predicted intravascular volumes, the predialysis BV was expanded in the majority with elevated PV as the main cause. No overall difference in RBCV was found between the measured and predicted volumes. According to predialysis Hb levels, all but one patient was anemic, but according to the measured RBCV, only nine were in the anemic range, indicating dilution of Hb.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".