Contact simulation analysis of double cylindrical asperities using the finite element method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To analyze the microcontact characteristics of the rough joint surface obtained by grinding more accurately, a frictionless contact model of double cylindrical asperities was established. The contact characteristics of double cylindrical asperities with different peak distance and different heights were analyzed using the finite element method. The relationship between contact load, contact pressure, contact area, and contact displacement were studied. And the effect of double asperities on the stress state of the cylindrical asperity contact zone was revealed. The results show that, in the elastic contact stage, the contact load, contact stress, contact pressure, and contact area decreased with an increase in the peak distance, and the corresponding values are smaller than that of single peak asperity contact. In the elastoplastic stage, because of the interaction of the double asperities, the change of the contact pressure with the contact displacement on the double asperities contact is larger than the corresponding value of the single peak asperity under the same conditions. The research can be applied into the model of anisotropic interface and provide theoretical foundations for the study on contact characteristics of grinding interface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".