MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006681949 · doi:10.21037/aes.2019.ab043

AB043. The glial protein Nogo-A is necessary to maintain retinal structure and function in physiological conditions

2019· article· en· W3006681949 on OpenAlexaff
Julius Baya Mdzomba, Léa Rodriguez, Sandrine Joly, Vincent Pernet

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Eye Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRetinal Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceRetinalFunction (biology)OphthalmologyMedicineCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Our previous studies revealed that Nogo-A gene ablation improved visual function recovery after retinal injury. Moreover, Nogo-A expression is highly expressed in the healthy retina. Its physiological role in retinal function is not known. The purpose of this current study was to determine the effects of acute Nogo-A silencing on retinal neuron structure and function in physiological conditions. Methods: Nogo-A silencing was done by intravitreal injection of adeno-associated virus serotype 2.2 containing a short hairpin RNA sequence (AAV2.2 shRNA-Nogo-A) and a GFP reporter gene in adult C57BL/6J mice. As control, an empty AAV2.2 vector was used. Infection of retinal cells was followed by fluorescent fundoscopy. Changes in Nogo-A expression were analysed by Western blotting in whole retinal lysates. Electroretinography was used to monitor retinal activity. The assessment of optokinetic reflex (OKR) allowed to follow visual acuity in unrestrained mice. Immunofluorescence on histological sections using the following cell markers, i.e., RNA-binding protein with multiple splicing (RBPMS) and sex-determining region Y-box 2 (Sox-2) allowed to visualize retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and Müller glia respectively. Results: GFP fluorescence revealed efficient AAV2.2 transfection in the ganglion cell layer and the inner nuclear layer 30 days after viral injection. By Western blotting, Nogo-A expression was decreased by ~75% in AAV2.2-shRNA-Nogo-A-treated retinae (n=3) as compared to the control mice (n=3). Strikingly, AAV2.2-shRNA-Nogo-A-injected animals (n=10) had a visual acuity reduction of 43.7% as compared to control (n=7), 60 days after transfection. Electroretinography (ERG) b-wave and a-wave amplitudes were also decreased by ~35% and 24.4% respectively relative to controls. After two months of transfection, RBPMS-positive RGCs were reduced by ~30% in AAV2.2-shRNA-Nogo-A (n=4) compared to non-injected contralateral eyes (n=4). The number of Sox2-expressing Müller cells was not affected after Nogo-A knockdown. Conclusions: Nogo-A gene silencing in the retina has deleterious effects on the mouse retinal structure and function, suggesting an important role for Nogo-A in retinal physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Eye ScienceSame topicRetinal Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207