MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3006738486 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.172

A173 RECOGNIZING RARE PRESENTATIONS OF POLYPOSIS SYNDROMES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED MALIGNANCIES IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

2020· article· en· W3006738486 on OpenAlexaff
N E Reitzel, Mary Sherlock, Mary Zachos, Jorge Arredondo, Elyanne M. Ratcliffe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFamilial adenomatous polyposisAsymptomaticAbdominal painColonoscopyInternal medicineGastroenterologyPolypectomyWork-upColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There is a range of polyposis syndromes and presentations in pediatrics. There are also associated extra-colonic malignancies of which to be cognizant when orchestrating the initial work-up of the various polyposis syndromes. Aims To use case review to highlight the importance of recognizing the breadth of presentations of polyposis syndromes in pediatrics. Methods Two recent pediatric presentations of polyposis with extra-intestinal manifestations were identified, chart review completed, and compared with newly published ESPGHAN guidelines. Results Two patients with intestinal polyposis are presented, in which extra-colonic malignancies and genetic mutations were identified. The first patient presented at age 16 with a history of fatigue and abdominal pain, and was found to have pancytopenia and splenomegaly. Initial work up included a bone marrow biopsy that was normal. The patient then underwent upper and lower endoscopic evaluation for increasing abdominal pain and persistent anemia and was found to have polymorphic polyps in the duodenum, sigmoid and rectum. On pathology, polyps were mostly inflammatory, but one was found to be hamartomatous. Additional screening revealed a thyroid nodule, found to be follicular carcinoma, requiring hemithyroidectomy. The patient was confirmed to have a PTEN mutation and was diagnosed with Cowden syndrome; following this diagnosis proceeded with a prophylactic bilateral mastectomy. The second patient was referred at age 15 with a strong family history of APC-associated FAP. At the time of consultation she was asymptomatic and she remained so throughout her work-up. Screening endoscopy revealed 70–90 recto-sigmoid adenomatous polyps as well as scattered gastric and duodenal polyps. Her initial work-up also uncovered an early papillary thyroid carcinoma. Her treatment included a total thyroidectomy and total proctocolectomy with J-pouch and ileoanal anastomosis. Follow-up endoscopy continues for surveillance of numerous gastric adenomas which to this point have not progressed to high-grade dysplasia or malignancy. Conclusions These 2 cases highlight the importance of recognizing that neoplastic conditions typically diagnosed in adulthood can also present in the pediatric age group. Ideally, further guidelines in pediatrics would be beneficial to ensure a consistent approach to investigating polyposis and associated malignancies. Pertaining to our specific patients, each had identification of a thyroid malignancy before the recommended screening age of 18 as per the currently accepted guideline, and neither were symptomatic. More cases are needed to establish if this earlier recognition of disease is meaningful in postulating potential mortality associated with a later diagnosis. Funding Agencies None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer→French-language works237,207→