MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006805851 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201908467

1D/2D Cobalt‐Based Nanohybrids as Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Generation

2020· article· en· W3006805851 on OpenAlexafffund
Fabiola Navarro‐Pardo, Jiabin Liu, Omar Abdelkarim, Gurpreet Singh Selopal, Aycan Yurtsever, Ana C. Tavares, Haiguang Zhao, Zhiming M. Wang, Federico Rosei

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTafel equationMaterials scienceCobaltChemical engineeringElectrodeSubstrate (aquarium)ElectrolysisNanotechnologyElectrochemistryChemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The synergistic effects derived from optimizing the chemical and structural features of electrocatalysts permit them to attain remarkable activity and stability. Herein, 1D/2D cobalt‐based nanohybrid (CoNH) electrodes are developed; the structural design consists of Co 3 O 4 electrospun nanoribbons (NRs) deposited onto a carbon fiber paper substrate where Co 3 O 4 nanosheets are subsequently grown via an electrodeposition step and UV/ozone treatment. The content of noncovalently functionalized carbon nanotubes within the Co 3 O 4 NRs is first tuned to enhance their charge transfer properties and mechanical stability. The electrocatalytic activity of the electrodes is further improved by a phosphorus modification of the 1D NRs, resulting in the formation of NaCoPO 4 . The optimized 1D/2D CoNH electrode, i.e., ED‐0.09 wt% fCNTs/P‐CoNHs, displays a similar performance to that of platinum in 0.25 m Na 2 S/0.35 m Na 2 SO 3 (Tafel slope ≈102 mV dec −1 for the former and ≈96 mV dec −1 for the latter) and outstanding stability for up to 48 h. The versatility and high activity of this electrode is also demonstrated according to tests in a conventional water splitting system (cell voltage 1.55V, to produce 10 mA cm −2 ) and a solar‐driven electrolyzer (1 m KOH).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFrench-language works237,207