MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3006845789 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.239

A240 ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF AGE AT DIAGNOSIS ON TRANSITION PROCESS IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES FROM PEDIATRIC TO ADULT CARE

2020· article· en· W3006845789 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoxiao Yang, S A Tchogna, C Deslandres, Prévost Jantchou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeInflammatory bowel diseaseYoung adultPediatricsDiseaseUlcerative colitisIncidence (geometry)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Twenty-five percent of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are diagnosed between the age of 16 and 18 years. They represent a unique challenge associated with the short follow-up time between diagnosis and transition to adult care. Aims The primary aim was to compare the current practices related to the transitional process in adolescents diagnosed before 16 years (early-adolescence (EA)) or after 16 years (late-adolescence (LA)). The secondary aim was to investigate clinical factors associated with age at transfer. Methods Patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2015, at the IBD clinic of CHU Sainte-Justine were included in the study. The date of transfer to adult care was defined as the date of the last visit in the pediatric unit. The factors associated with transition process and transfer included: disease type, disease severity at diagnosis and last pediatric visit, age at diagnosis, treatment group, disease burden (hospitalizations/relapses) and disease education. Results We included 144 patients (77 males; median (interquartile range (IQR) age at diagnosis 15.2(14.3–16.2) years; Crohn’s disease (N=98), ulcerative colitis (N=31) and IBD-unclassified (N=15). The median (IQR) duration of pediatric follow-up was 3.6 (2.7–4.1) years in the EA group as compared to 1.4 (1.0–1.8) yrs in the LA group; P< 0.01. While most of the patients completed the transition at a median (IQR) age of 18.0 (17.9–18.3) years, 15 % of patients were transferred at an older age (18.5 to 20 years). Overall, 75.7% were in remission, 13.9% with mild disease activity and 10.4% with moderate activity at the last pediatric visit. Patients with moderate activity at last pediatric visit tend to be transferred at an older age as compared to patients in remission or mild activity. The median (IQR) age were respectively 18.4 (18.2–19.1), 18.0 (17.9–18.1), 18.0 (17.9–18.3) years; P=0.024. There was a modest correlation between age at diagnosis and age at transfer (R = 0.22; P = 0.0068). Patients were transferred to adult gastroenterologists in academic hospitals (50.8%) or non-academic hospitals (43.1%). However, the disease activity at transfer was not associated with the adult care setting (academic vs non-academic). The number of relapses and hospitalizations during pediatric care were associated with older age at transfer: (> 18.5 yrs vs < 18.5 years): median(IQR) of 0.8(0.4–1.4) vs 0.3 (0.-0.6) for relapses; P=0.009 and 0.4 (0.0–1.1) vs 0.3 (0.0–0.7) for hospitalizations; P=0.009. Conclusions Pediatric IBD diagnosed at late adolescence tend to have more active disease and older age at transfer. Therefore, efforts to design a structured transitional care program are needed in order to improve transition outcomes for IBD patients with a special focus for subjects diagnosed in late adolescence. Funding Agencies CAG

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare→French-language works237,207→