Allgrove Syndrome: A Report of New Pathological Variants in the AAAS Gene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report 2 novel variants in the AAAS gene consistent with the diagnosis of Allgrove syndrome. METHODS: A 12-year-old girl was referred to our clinic for progressive bilateral decrease in visual acuity. She was known for achalasia that had been surgically treated at a very early age. On examination, she was found to have dry eye disease secondary to lacrimal insufficiency. She also had anisocoria, light-near dissociation, and bilateral optic nerve atrophy. RESULTS: Neurological examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging were within normal limits. Genetic workup revealed compound heterozygosity for 2 novel variants in the AAAS gene, confirming the diagnosis of Allgrove syndrome. The patient was referred to endocrinology to screen for adrenocorticotropic hormone insufficiency. She was started on topical lubricating therapy that improved her symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Allgrove syndrome is a rare genetic disease that is characterized by the triad of achalasia, alacrima, and adrenal insufficiency. Early diagnosis, confirmed with genetic testing, is essential to initiate an appropriate follow-up and prevent a life-threatening addisonian crisis. Report of novel mutations is important to further characterize this disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".