MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006921461 · doi:10.1002/gj.3795

Genetic link between gold mineralization and porphyry magmatism in the Baogutu district, West Junggar, NW China: Constraints from Re‐Os and S isotopes in sulphide

2020· article· en· W3006921461 on OpenAlexaff
Fang An, Yongfeng Zhu, Jeremy P. Richards, Robert A. Creaser, Lin Chen, Bo Zheng, Bernd Lehmann

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLaurentian University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIsochronMagmatismGeologyDioriteGeochemistryMineralization (soil science)PyriteIgneous rockGenetic modelCrustMantle (geology)TectonicsZirconPaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Baogutu is a large gold deposit (4 Mt @ 5.5 g/t Au) in West Junggar, NW China. We conducted a Re‐Os geochronological study on seven pyrite samples from auriferous quartz‐pyrite veins, which yielded a Re‐Os isochron age of 312 ± 11 Ma (2σ). This age defines the timing of gold mineralization, and overlaps the emplacement age of diorite to granodiorite porphyry stocks (319–310 Ma) in the Baogutu district. The Os initial ratio of 0.46 ± 0.21 (2σ) suggests a mix of components from both mantle and continental crust in the ore‐forming system, which is similar to the proposed magma source of porphyry stocks. The δ34S values of sulphide minerals vary in a narrow range from +0.1 to −3.3‰, indicating that the sulphur is likely of igneous origin. Our data suggest that the Baogutu gold mineralization is probably genetically linked to the regional diorite to granodiorite magmatism. The new data provide important constraints for an evolving genetic model of the Baogutu gold deposit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological JournalSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207