MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3006952498 · doi:10.1002/sia.6757

Experimental investigation on wetting mechanism for coal dust with different metamorphic degree based on infrared spectrum and <sup>13</sup> C‐NMR

2020· article· en· W3006952498 on OpenAlex
Qingtao Zhang, Gang Zhou, Yingying Hu, Wenjing Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCoal Properties and Utilization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoalCoal dustWettingPneumoconiosisCoal miningCarbon fibersMicrostructureVitriniteMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryMineralogyMetallurgyComposite materialOrganic chemistryMedicineEngineeringComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Respirable coal dust accounts for heart and respiratory diseases of coal miners such as asthma, pneumoconiosis, and black lung disease. What is more, coal dust explosion seriously affects coal mine safety production and coal miners' life safety. Generally, dust suppressants are commonly applied in coal mines. However, current dust suppressants are not working effectively. To develop a better dust suppressant, we attempt to explore the factors affecting the wettability of coal dust under different metamorphic levels from the essence of coal dust wetting mechanism in this paper. Specifically, we use Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) to reveal the microstructure of coal from two aspects of functional group and carbon skeleton structure and obtain the micro information of the surface functional group types, quantity, and carbon structure of coal with different degrees of metamorphism, as well as the change rule of functional group of coal sample with coal rank and the law of carbon increase and deoxidization of coal metamorphism. After that, we acquired the structural parameters of coal by the NMR experiments and fitted the quantitative mathematical relationship between the microstructure parameters and wettability of coal through SPSS and ORIGIN software. Finally, this paper constructs an evaluation model for the influencing factors of coal dust wettability, explains the influence degree of different coal dust structure on coal dust wettability, improves the coal dust wettability mechanism, and provides more quantitative research ideas and methods for the control of coal dust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.177
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it