MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Expression of circulating miR375 and miR371 to differentiate teratoma and viable germ cell tumor in patients with post-chemotherapy residual disease.

2020· article· en· W3007014868 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia Nappi, Marisa Thi, Nabil Adra, Ricardo Leão, Bernhard J. Eigl, Kim N., Martin Gleave, Alan So, Peter C. Black, Robert J. Hamilton, Siamak Daneshmand, Clint Cary, Timothy A. Masterson, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Craig R. Nichols, Christian Kollmannsberger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeminomaMedicineChemotherapyTeratomaGerm cell tumorsGerm cellPathologyMinimal residual diseaseStage (stratigraphy)OncologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

414 Background: Viable germ cell tumors (vGCT) express high levels of certain circulating microRNAs, including miR-371a-3p (miR371) that has shown high specificity and sensitivity. However, neither tissue nor serum/plasma from patients with only teratoma are miR371 positive. miR375 is overexpressed in teratoma tissue, but detectability in blood is unknown. Methods: miR371 and miR375 expression was analyzed in 100 patients with various stages and histology of GCT. miR375 expression in teratoma was validated in patients with post-chemotherapy pathologically confirmed teratoma (PCPCT). The miRNAs expression was assessed by RT-PCR and quantified by ΔΔCT method. The optimal cut-off for miR375 expression was estimated by Youden index ( > 20). Spike-in cel-miR-39-3p, miR-451 and miR-30b-5p were used as internal controls. Sensitivity, specificity, AUC of the ROC of miR375 in detecting teratoma was analyzed. Results: In the discovery cohort miR371 and miR375 were measured in 62 pts: 27 CSI NED, 15 chemo-naïve metastatic seminoma and 20 with PCPCT. miR375 was over-expressed in pts with teratoma compared to CSI and seminoma pts (p = 0.002), while miR371 was expressed in the seminoma pts and undetectable in the PCPCT and CSI pts (p < 0.001). In the post-chemotherapy setting, 38 pts were analyzed: 21 PCPCT, 6 vGCT and 11 complete remission (CR). Also in this cohort, miR375 was over-expressed in pts with teratoma compared to the pts presenting vGCT and post-chemotherapy CR (p = 0.01), while miR371 was detectable only in the pts with vGCT (p < 0.001). Overall, sensitivity and specificity of miR375 in identifying teratoma were 78% and 80%, respectively; the AUC was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.5490-0.8186; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Pts with residual post-chemotherapy teratoma present higher plasma levels of miR375 compared to pts with vGCT in whom miR375 is low but miR371 is expressed at high levels. The simultaneous evaluation of miR371 and miR375 may be clinically useful to predict the histology of the GCT components in pts with post-chemotherapy residual disease to inform the best therapeutic options (surgery or chemotherapy). Further validation within larger studies is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→