MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3007022658

Will the real rural community please stand up? Staging rural community-based tourism in Costa Rica.

2019· article· en· W3007022658 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Susan E. Mannon, Bonnie Glass‐Coffin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismRural tourismRuralityRural communityPolitical scienceGeographyRural areaEconomic growthHumanitiesSociologyTourism geographySocioeconomicsEconomicsArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rural community-based tourism is an increasingly popular way for rural communities in the developing world to preserve their cultural and natural heritage while generating needed income. For this form of tourism to attract sufficient tourist traffic, however, rural communities must attend to tourists’ desire for ‘authenticity’ by carefully staging rurality and community. This article examines how two rural community-based tourism projects in Costa Rica stage, or package their communities for tourist consumption. One project portrays the community as socially cooperative and environmentally conscious, downplaying the growing class tensions and environmental problems that have come to characterize the community. Another project acknowledges community conflicts and environmental degradation but does not fully account for the limits and challenges of rural development. We conclude by discussing the potential of rural community-based tourism to foster economic development in these communities and conversations about the limitations of such development. Keywords: Community-based tourism, rural development, rural community, staged authenticity, Costa Rica ------------------------------------------------- La vraie communaute rurale voudra-t-elle se lever? Organiser le tourisme communautaire rural au Costa Rica. Le tourisme communautaire rural est un moyen de plus en plus populaire pour les communautes rurales des pays en developpement de preserver leur patrimoine culturel et naturel tout en generant les revenus necessaires. Cependant, pour que cette forme de tourisme attire suffisamment de touristes, les communautes rurales doivent repondre au desir d'authenticite des touristes en organisant soigneusement la mise en scene de la ruralite et de la communaute. Cet article examine comment deux projets de tourisme communautaire rural au Costa Rica mettent en scene ou conditionnent leurs communautes pour la consommation touristique. Un projet depeint la communaute comme cooperative et soucieuse de l'environnement, minimisant les tensions croissantes de classe et les problemes environnementaux qui caracterisent la communaute. Un autre projet reconnait les conflits communautaires et la degradation de l'environnement mais ne tient pas pleinement compte des limites et des defis du developpement rural. Nous concluons en discutant du potentiel du tourisme communautaire rural pour favoriser le developpement economique de ces communautes et en discutant des limites d'un tel developpement. Mots-cles: Tourisme communautaire, developpement rural, communaute rurale, authenticite mise en scene, Costa Rica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchFrench-language works237,207