A29 HOPX LABELS A COLONIC STEM CELL THAT CONTRIBUTES TO COLONIC REGENERATION BUT NOT COLONIC TUMORS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Colorectal cancer is the 2nd leading cause of cancer death in Canada. In rapidly dividing tissues such as the intestine or colon, only long-lived, multipotent, self-renewing tissue stem cells have longevity to accumulate mutations and serve as the cellular origin of cancer. In the small intestine, genetic fate mapping studies have demonstrated that there are at least two principal stem cell pools: actively cycling, crypt base cells expressing Lgr5, and quiescent cells situated above the crypt base. Clevers and colleagues have previously shown that Lgr5-expressing cells can give rise to cancer upon mutation. Interestingly, when Lgr5+ stem cells are selectively “killed”, intestinal integrity remains intact and other stem cells restore homeostasis. To determine whether another stem cell population can give rise to cancer in the colon, we examined whether the atypical homeobox protein Hopx, marks stem cells in the colon and whether these cells can give rise to colon cancer. Aims In the present study, we aim to determine whether Hopx-expressing cells are colonic stem cells that contribute to gut healing and can give rise to colonic tumours following the loss of APC. Methods To determine whether Hopx expressing cells show stemness, we crossed Hopx-CreERT mice to R26-TdTomato reporter mice. We then conducted genetic lineage tracing studies in the colon during homeostasis and following dextran sodium sulphate (DSS)-induced colitis. To test the function of Hopx expressing cells, Hopx-CreERT mice were also crossed to R26DTR mice and treated with diphtheria toxin (DT) following tamoxifen. These mice were then exposed to either normal drinking water or DSS to determine the role of Hopx+ cells in colonic regeneration. To test whether Hopx expressing cells can serve as a cellular origin for colon cancer, Hopx-CreERT mice were crossed to Apcf/f (floxed) mice. Results Consistent with the labeling of a stem cell, following tamoxifen, Hopx+ cells expressing tdTomato expanded to lineage trace full colonic crypts within 7 days, and labelling was persistent for greater than 6 months. Interestingly, ablation of Hopx+ cells with DT did not alter weight, histological damage or survival during normal homeostasis, however, Hopx+ cell ablation in mice treated with DSS resulted in increased histological damage. Surprisingly, loss of APC in Hopx-expressing cells did not induce colonic adenomas even after 8 months following tamoxifen administration. Conclusions These findings prove that Hopx expressing cells identify a novel colonic stem cell pool that is redundant in homeostasis, but in the context of injury, are essential for epithelial regeneration. Interestingly, Hopx+ cells do not have the capacity to give rise to colorectal adenomas upon loss of the APC gene. Funding Agencies CIHR
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".